How to find (and keep) your moral research compass in interdisciplinary research projects
Everyone has read the stories about individual cases of scientific misconduct. But research projects are rarely performed by just one researcher, it is often a collaboration between several researchers coming from different disciplines and research schools. Which means not one but several views on what it means to do good science. Could this cause extra threats to scientific integrity? Maybe lead to inefficient cooperation, avoiding innovation, unfounded questioning of integrity and credibility or even conflict?
How do interdisciplinary scientific collaborations define research integrity and good science? And how do they deal with differences that occur?
Dr. Bart Penders - Assistant Professor Metamedica at the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences - hopes to find answers to these questions within his research project Integrity in Interdisciplinary Research Collaborations. His goal: ‘to document the moral spaces diverse groups of scientists occupy and the ways in which they are bridged in practice, thereafter sketching a moral topography of science’. Penders got a €150.000,- funding from ZonMW (a national funding organisation for health research and development). With this money he will assemble a team to conduct an in-depth qualitative study of three research collectives (the Academy of Midwifery, the KOALA Birth Cohort and the Dutch Academy of Nutrition Science) that are characterised by collaborative working modes and interdisciplinary contexts.
The funding of this research project is part of ZonMW’s new programme Fostering Responsible Research Practices (FRRP) with which they encourage quality, integrity, efficiency and positive social impact in scientific and academic research.
ZonMW’s principal commissioners are the Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS) and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Also read
-
Kira moved from Northern Germany to Maastricht for a Double Degree Programme between the University of Maastricht and Bremen. She combined her master’s 'Healthcare Provision, Management, and Economics’ with our international perspective on health in the master's ‘Governance and Leadership in...
-
Estefania works for the European Patient’s Forum, the leading voice of patient organisations in Europe. Her role involves creating a dialogue between patient organisations and stakeholders for European projects. To uphold patient empowerment through patient advisory boards, Estefania relies on...
-
Rianne strives to create value for clinicians and patients at Maastro using data science.
